Daigle Law Group is a leading law firm that specializes in management consulting services to support and develop effective and constitutional policing practices.

Legal Updates
Cameras, Commands, and Constitutional Boundaries: Second Circuit Examines Massimino v. Benoit...
November 10, 2026
The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit recently issued an opinion in Massimino v. Benoit, addressing whether officers can be granted qualified immunity for conducting an investigative detention of someone who is exercising their First Amendment right to record police activity from a public location.
​
​
Prolonged Standoff & Probable Cause: Seventh Circuit Grants Qualified Immunity in Jackson v. City of Madison...
October 20, 2026
The United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit recently decided Jackson v. City of Madison, addressing a warrantless in-home arrest following reports of gunfire that led to an hours-long standoff with a suspect believed to be armed and dangerous.
​
​
​
When Terms of Service Act as Consent: Seventh Circuit Considers Cloud Storage in United States v. Blocker...
November 4, 2026
The United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit recently examined United States v. Blocker, 174 F.4th 587 (7th Cir. 2026). This case highlights that agreeing to terms of service can constitute valid consent for a company to scan files and report illegal material to authorities.
​
​
​
Standoff, Shots, Shielded: Seventh Circuit Affirms Qualified Immunity in Davis v. City of Elgin, Illinois...
October 13, 2026
The United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit recently issued an opinion in Davis v. City of Elgin, Illinois, addressing whether officers were entitled to qualified immunity for using less-lethal force during a volatile standoff.
​
​
​​​
​
Refused Care, Reasonable Restraint: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Qualified Immunity in Marbut v. Phillips...
October 27, 2026
In Marbut v. Phillips, 176 F.4th 1256 (11th Cir. 2026), the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit affirmed qualified immunity for officers who detained and restrained a woman following a suspected GHB overdose. The Eleventh Circuit found that officers had an objectively reasonable basis to seize her under the emergency-aid doctrine...
​
Flight, Factors, and the Fourth Amendment: Supreme Court Finds Reasonable Suspicion in District of Columbia v. R.W., 608 U.S. ___ (2026)...
October 6, 2026
In District of Columbia v. R.W., 608 U.S. ___ (2026), the Supreme Court of the United States affirmed that when courts are tasked with assessing whether a police officer had reasonable suspicion, the court must consider the totality of the circumstances, which precludes evaluating and rejecting individual factors in isolation from each other.
Developing the Guardian Mindset Podcast​
SCOTUS Affirms Standard for Emergency Aid Entry Into the Home
​​This episode of the Guardian Mindset Podcast with Attorney Eric Daigle breaks down the Supreme Court’s Case v. Montana decision and what it means for welfare checks, mental health calls, and warrantless entry into a home. Learn when officers can act without a warrant and how to apply the emergency aid exception the right way.
Daigle Law Group Client Success Advisor
Contact Information:
​
Katie Parrott
Client Success Advisor
Daigle Law Group, LLC
860-270-0060 ext 106
katie.parrott@daiglelawgroup.com
​
